Forums
New posts
Search forums
Featured Threads
Timelines
Immigration Timeline AU
Citizenship Timeline AU
Statistics
Occupation Ceiling AU
Invitation Rounds AU
Invitation Cutoffs AU
Point Distribution AU
State Nomination AU
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Featured Threads
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Immigration To Australia
Skill Assessment
Engineers Australia Occupation Outcome, Review and Appeal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EBB90" data-source="post: 138341" data-attributes="member: 18666"><p>Thank you [USER=3731]@mohsinciddiki[/USER] and [USER=1]@MysticRiver[/USER] for your advices.</p><p></p><p>[USER=1]@MysticRiver[/USER] In my review I had clearly stated in my cover letter that my skills, competencies, entire work experience, ect. are supporting my preferred occupation outcome (I even didn't get any comments from the EA assessor on any of my submitted documents for not being relevant to the preferred occupation).</p><p></p><p>I felt that the external assessor was biased with the EA assessor as he/she referred back to the same reason and ignored the fact that B.Sc in Civil Engineering (in many countries, though I'm not sure about AUS.) teaches merely fundamentals in couple of courses for each subdicspline including Transportation, Structural, Water, Geotechinal, etc. thus, mentioning more intensive courses required was unrealistic in my case.</p><p></p><p>I also believe that it was unfair to base the occupation outcome on how many courses I have taken in a subdicspline and simply ignoring the competency I had demonstrated in that domain. I will give it a thought before squeezing addtional 400$ for a formal appeal.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EBB90, post: 138341, member: 18666"] Thank you [USER=3731]@mohsinciddiki[/USER] and [USER=1]@MysticRiver[/USER] for your advices. [USER=1]@MysticRiver[/USER] In my review I had clearly stated in my cover letter that my skills, competencies, entire work experience, ect. are supporting my preferred occupation outcome (I even didn't get any comments from the EA assessor on any of my submitted documents for not being relevant to the preferred occupation). I felt that the external assessor was biased with the EA assessor as he/she referred back to the same reason and ignored the fact that B.Sc in Civil Engineering (in many countries, though I'm not sure about AUS.) teaches merely fundamentals in couple of courses for each subdicspline including Transportation, Structural, Water, Geotechinal, etc. thus, mentioning more intensive courses required was unrealistic in my case. I also believe that it was unfair to base the occupation outcome on how many courses I have taken in a subdicspline and simply ignoring the competency I had demonstrated in that domain. I will give it a thought before squeezing addtional 400$ for a formal appeal. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Immigration To Australia
Skill Assessment
Engineers Australia Occupation Outcome, Review and Appeal
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience, show you relevant Google ads and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top