ACS RPL reject result confusion

NIma

Newbie
Messages
1
Points
1
Timeline missing
Hello,
My result come today and unfortunately, it was negative, but they give me 60 days to appeal. I understand the problem is about my RPL but I don't understand how and where because first it says on top:
"The detail supplied in the ACS Project Report for the RPL application is insufficient to demonstrate the
depth and breadth of knowledge consistent with formal tertiary studies in ICT.
"

but in the work experience section it mentions:
"- Not Assessed due to plagiarism in RPL report"

I`m totally confused here what is the problem? Is it insufficient? is it plagiarism? which one is the main issue? Did I need to prove genuinely my current RPL or I need to write a new and thorough one?

I appreciate it if someone could help me here
 

mohsinciddiki

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
4,022
Points
83
MSA
2018-08-02
Skill
261111
SC
189/190
Point
75/80
EOI
2018-08-17
Nom.
2018-11-11
Inv.
2018-11-11
App.
2018-12-22
CO
2019-03-27
PCC
2019-02-23
HC
2019-02-18
Grant
2019-06-03
IED
2020-02-20
Hello,
My result come today and unfortunately, it was negative, but they give me 60 days to appeal. I understand the problem is about my RPL but I don't understand how and where because first it says on top:
"The detail supplied in the ACS Project Report for the RPL application is insufficient to demonstrate the
depth and breadth of knowledge consistent with formal tertiary studies in ICT.
"

but in the work experience section it mentions:
"- Not Assessed due to plagiarism in RPL report"

I`m totally confused here what is the problem? Is it insufficient? is it plagiarism? which one is the main issue? Did I need to prove genuinely my current RPL or I need to write a new and thorough one?

I appreciate it if someone could help me here
You can ask them directly about the issues, then you need to remove that part from ACS and try to work more on relevancy with your occupation. Also add some more technical stuff related to your nominated occupation
 
  • Like
Reactions: NIma
MSA
2018-08-02
Skill
261111
SC
189/190
Point
75/80
EOI
2018-08-17
Nom.
2018-11-11
Inv.
2018-11-11
App.
2018-12-22
CO
2019-03-27
PCC
2019-02-23
HC
2019-02-18
Grant
2019-06-03
IED
2020-02-20
Hello,
My result come today and unfortunately, it was negative, but they give me 60 days to appeal. I understand the problem is about my RPL but I don't understand how and where because first it says on top:
"The detail supplied in the ACS Project Report for the RPL application is insufficient to demonstrate the
depth and breadth of knowledge consistent with formal tertiary studies in ICT.
"

but in the work experience section it mentions:
"- Not Assessed due to plagiarism in RPL report"

I`m totally confused here what is the problem? Is it insufficient? is it plagiarism? which one is the main issue? Did I need to prove genuinely my current RPL or I need to write a new and thorough one?

I appreciate it if someone could help me here
Same case happened with me today. Did you take any further action?
 
Hello,
My result come today and unfortunately, it was negative, but they give me 60 days to appeal. I understand the problem is about my RPL but I don't understand how and where because first it says on top:
"The detail supplied in the ACS Project Report for the RPL application is insufficient to demonstrate the
depth and breadth of knowledge consistent with formal tertiary studies in ICT.
"

but in the work experience section it mentions:
"- Not Assessed due to plagiarism in RPL report"

I`m totally confused here what is the problem? Is it insufficient? is it plagiarism? which one is the main issue? Did I need to prove genuinely my current RPL or I need to write a new and thorough one?

I appreciate it if someone could help me here
How did you proceed with this ?
 
Consider before posting:
  • Do not post the same thing in multiple places.
  • No personal contact and/or non-English phrase is allowed.
  • Always post in a relevant thread or open a new one.
  • Better to use the reactions in a post to congratulate/thank.
Top