Khurramk-s
Newbie
- Messages
- 2
- Points
- 1
Timeline missing
Hello Everyone,
I received the following comment from Engineers Australia regarding my skills assessment application with ANZSCO Code 233311. I have written all three career episodes by myself and all were from my professional experience. But still I got this comment. Now, how should I address this issue in order to prevent rejection:
“For CE1, CE2 and CE3,
We have identified high similarities between all three career episodes submitted and Internet sources. Please read Engineers Australia has given warning regarding migration skills assessment fraud and plagiarism before submitting your frank explanation with the information of sources you referred to prepare your CEs. If you fail to provide the requested explanation in the given time frame or if the explanation is going to be assessed as not satisfactory - this application may be rejected.”
I received the following comment from Engineers Australia regarding my skills assessment application with ANZSCO Code 233311. I have written all three career episodes by myself and all were from my professional experience. But still I got this comment. Now, how should I address this issue in order to prevent rejection:
“For CE1, CE2 and CE3,
We have identified high similarities between all three career episodes submitted and Internet sources. Please read Engineers Australia has given warning regarding migration skills assessment fraud and plagiarism before submitting your frank explanation with the information of sources you referred to prepare your CEs. If you fail to provide the requested explanation in the given time frame or if the explanation is going to be assessed as not satisfactory - this application may be rejected.”